![]() |
Hi All
We have 2 clusters (Primary and secondary) running and both are always in sync from data perspective. Always consumers are using Primary only, but when primary is not reachable, it should get redirected to secondary cluster How can this be achieved ? 1. Can we do anything on the cluster side which will take care of this, like with config changes on the primary cluster like changing the connecton string etc. Like some of the messaging products uses connection URLs like tcp://server1||tco://server2 something like this, if server1 is not reachable, it will get routed to server2. Somehing like this can be done here ? 2. DOing this from consumer side only, as and when they get exceptions like disconnect etc, try connecting it to secondary and vice versa What are the options we have for this scenario Thanks Naveen -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ |
![]() ![]() |
Alexandr Shapkin |
![]() |
Hi, I don’t think that ignite support this out of the box, cause data replication is something beyond the default distribution. The usage depends on how your data is replicated, whether you want active-active synchronization, and so on. But if it’s about switching from one cluster to another, and always using a single cluster at a time, something like dynamic DNS or a custom load balancer should work here. I.e. you can configure your consumers to access domain my.cluster.com that resolves to the primary cluster, IP=192.168.1.1. When you want to switch the load, you can adjust your DNS to resolve the name to, say, IP=192.168.1.13 which means the secondary one. This approach has some drawbacks but is quite simple to use and straightforward. From: [hidden email] Hi All We have 2 clusters (Primary and secondary) running and both are always in sync from data perspective. Always consumers are using Primary only, but when primary is not reachable, it should get redirected to secondary cluster How can this be achieved ? 1. Can we do anything on the cluster side which will take care of this, like with config changes on the primary cluster like changing the connecton string etc. Like some of the messaging products uses connection URLs like tcp://server1||tco://server2 something like this, if server1 is not reachable, it will get routed to server2. Somehing like this can be done here ? 2. DOing this from consumer side only, as and when they get exceptions like disconnect etc, try connecting it to secondary and vice versa What are the options we have for this scenario Thanks Naveen -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Alex Shapkin
|
![]() |
This DR feature is what you are looking for, complete solution: https://www.gridgain.com/docs/latest/administrators-guide/data-center-replication/introduction
On Sunday, December 6, 2020, Alexandr Shapkin <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- - Denis |
![]() |
In reply to this post by Alexandr Shapkin
HI
We have no issue with the data replication, we do have feeder services feeding data into multiple clusters real time. And, we are going to have active active set up only, but secondary is only used in case primary has any issues. At the moment, consumers use the full connection string like CL1-1:p1,CL1-2:p1,CL1-3:p1 (CL1 for cluster) for primary and CL2-1:p1,CL2-2:p1, CL2-3:p1 for secondary. Dynamic DNS may work well for single server like you configure my.cluster.com to resolve CL1-1 when everything is fine and then to CL2-1 if CL1-1 is not reachable. But this might cause an issue, if server CL1-1 node is down, but the cluster is still up and running, but still requests are getting routed to secondary right. DNS only resolve for single IP right, not the whole cluster connection string. Am I making sense here, hope I am making it clear. Any, well known load balancers used here for achieving HA between the clusters in active active setup. Thanks Naveen -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ |
![]() |
In reply to this post by Alexandr Shapkin
Hi Alex
This got ignored for a while But the known drawbacks of this approach, can you please let me know as I need to finalize an approach on how to route requests to secondary site if primary is not in working condition etc Thanks -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |